My Blogs
|
Common Sense Part 5
by Thomas Paine
Appendix To The Third Addition
October 18, 2005
(originally
published in 1776)
SINCE the publication of the first edition of this pamphlet, or rather,
on the same day on which it came out, the king's speech made its
appearance in this city. Had the spirit of prophecy directed the birth
of this production, it could not have brought it forth at a more
seasonable juncture, or at a more necessary time. The bloody-mindedness
of the one, shows the necessity of pursuing the doctrine of the other.
Men read by way of revenge. And the speech, instead of terrifying,
prepared a way for the manly principles of independence.
Ceremony, and even silence, from whatever motives they
may arise, have a hurtful tendency when they give the least degree of
countenance to base and wicked performances, wherefore, if this maxim
be admitted, it naturally follows, that the king's speech, IS being a
piece of finished villany, deserved and still deserves, a general
execration, both by the Congress and the people.
Yet, as the domestic tranquillity of a nation, depends
greatly on the chastity of what might properly be called NATIONAL
MANNERS, it is often better to pass some things over in silent disdain,
than to make use of such new methods of dislike, as might introduce the
least innovation on that guardian of our peace and safety. And,
perhaps, it is chiefly owing to this prudent delicacy, that the king's
speech hath not before now suffered a public execution. The speech, if
it may be called one, is nothing better than a wilful audacious libel
against the truth, the common good, and the existence of mankind; and
is a formal and pompous method of offering up human sacrifices to the
pride of tyrants.
But this general massacre of mankind, is one of the
privileges and the certain consequences of kings, for as nature knows
them not, they know not her, and although they are beings of our own
creating, they know not us, and are become the gods of their creators.
The speech hath one good quality, which is, that it is not calculated
to deceive, neither can we, even if we would, be deceived by it.
Brutality and tyranny appear on the face of it.
It leaves us at no loss: And every line convinces, even
in the moment of reading, that he who hunts the woods for prey, the
naked and untutored Indian, is less savage than the king of Britain.
Sir John Dalrymple, the putative father of a whining jesuitical piece,
fallaciously called, "The address of the people of England to the
inhabitants of America," hath perhaps from a vain supposition that the
people here were to be frightened at the pomp and description of a
king, given (though very unwisely on his part) the real character of
the present one:
"But," says this writer, "if you are inclined to pay
compliments to an administration, which we do not complain of (meaning
the Marquis of Rockingham's at the repeal of the Stamp Act) it is very
unfair in you to withhold them from that prince, by whose NOD ALONE
they were permitted to do any thing." This is toryism with a
witness!
Here is idolatry even without a mask: And he who can
calmly hear and digest such doctrine, hath forfeited his claim to
rationality an apostate from the order of manhood and ought to be
considered as one who hath not only given up the proper dignity of man,
but sunk himself beneath the rank of animals, and contemptibly crawls
through the world like a worm.
However, it matters very little now what the king of
England either says or does; he hath wickedly broken through every
moral and human obligation, trampled nature and conscience beneath his
feet, and by a steady and constitutional spirit of insolence and
cruelty procured for himself an universal hatred. It is now the
interest of America to provide for herself.
She hath already a large and young family, whom it is
more her duty to take care of, than to be granting away her property to
support a power who is become a reproach to the names of men and
christians, whose office it is to watch the morals of a nation, of
whatsoever sect or denomination ye are of, as well as ye who are more
immediately the guardians of the public liberty, if ye wish to preserve
your native country uncontaminated by European corruption, ye must in
secret wish a separation. But leaving the moral part to private
reflection, I shall chiefly confine my further remarks to the following
heads:
First, That it is the interest of America to be
separated from Britain.
Secondly, Which is the easiest and most practicable
plan, RECONCILIATION or INDEPENDENCE? with some occasional remarks.
In support of the first, I could, if I judged it proper,
produce the opinion of some of the ablest and most experienced men on
this continent: and whose sentiments on that head, are not yet publicly
known. It is in reality a self-evident position: for no nation in a
state of foreign dependence, limited in its commerce, and cramped and
fettered in its legislative powers, can ever arrive at any material
eminence. America doth not yet know what opulence is; and although the
progress which she hath made stands unparalleled in the history of
other nations, it is but childhood compared with what she would be
capable of arriving at, had she, as she ought to have, the legislative
powers in her own hands.
England is at this time proudly coveting what would do
her no good were she to accomplish it; and the continent hesitating on
a matter which will be her final ruin if neglected. It is the commerce
and not the conquest of America by which England is to be benefited,
and that would in a great measure continue, were the countries as
independent of each other as France and Spain; because the specious
errors of those who speak without reflecting. And among the many which
I have heard, the following seems the most general, viz. that had this
rupture happened forty or fifty years hence, instead of now, the
continent would have been more able to have shaken off the
dependence.
To which I reply, that our military ability, at this
time, arises from the experience gained in the last war, and which in
forty or fifty years' time, would be totally extinct. The continent
would not, by that time, have a quitrent reserved thereon will always
lessen, and in time will wholly support, the yearly expense of
government. It matters not how long the debt is in paying, so that the
lands when sold be applied to the discharge of it, and for the
execution of which the Congress for the time being will be the
continental trustees.
I proceed now to the second head, viz. Which is the
easiest and most practicable plan, reconciliation or independence; with
some occasional remarks.
He who takes nature for his guide, is not easily beaten
out of his argument, and on that ground, I answer generally that
independence being a single simple line, contained within ourselves;
and reconciliation, a matter exceedingly perplexed and complicated, and
in which a treacherous capricious court is to interfere, gives the
answer without a doubt.
The present state of America is truly alarming to every
man who is capable of reflection. Without law, without government,
without any other mode of power than what is founded on, and granted
by, courtesy. Held together by an unexampled occurrence of sentiment,
which is nevertheless subject to change, and which every secret enemy
is endeavoring to dissolve. Our present condition is, Legislation
without law; wisdom without a plan; a constitution without a name; and,
what is strangely astonishing, perfect independence contending for
dependence. The instance is without a precedent, the case never existed
before, and who can tell what may be the event?
The property of no man is secure in the present
un-braced system of things. The mind of the multitude is left at
random, and seeing no fixed object before them, they pursue such as
fancy or opinion presents. Nothing is criminal; there is no such thing
as treason, wherefore, every one thinks himself at liberty to act as he
pleases. The Tories would not have dared to assemble offensively, had
they known that their lives, by that act, were forfeited to the laws of
the state. A line of distinction should be drawn between English
soldiers taken in battle, and inhabitants of America taken in arms. The
first are prisoners, but the latter traitors. The one forfeits his
liberty, the other his head.
Notwithstanding our wisdom, there is a visible
feebleness in some of our proceedings which gives encouragement to
dissensions. The continental belt is too loosely buckled: And if
something is not done in time, it will be too late to do any thing, and
we shall fall into a state, in which neither reconciliation nor
independence will be practicable. The king and his worthless adherents
are got at their old game of dividing the continent, and there are not
wanting among us printers who will be busy in spreading specious
falsehoods. The artful and hypocritical letter which appeared a few
months ago in two of the New York papers, and likewise in two others,
is an evidence that there are men who want both judgment and honesty.
It is easy getting into holes and corners, and talking
of reconciliation: But do such men seriously consider how difficult the
task is, and how dangerous it may prove, should the continent divide
thereon? Do they take within their view all the various orders of men
whose situation and circumstances, as well as their own, are to be
considered therein? Do they put themselves in the place of the sufferer
whose all is already gone, and of the soldier, who hath quitted all for
the defence of his country? If their ill-judged moderation be suited to
their own private situations only, regardless of others, the event will
convince them that "they are reckoning without their host."
Put us, say some, on the footing we were in the year
1763: To which I answer, the request is not now in the power of Britain
to comply with, neither will she propose it; but if it were, and even
should be granted, I ask, as a reasonable question, By what means is
such a corrupt and faithless court to be kept to its engagements?
Another parliament, nay, even the present, may hereafter repeal the
obligation, on the pretence of its being violently obtained, or unit
wisely granted; and, in that case, Where is our redress? No going to
law with nations; cannon are the barristers of crowns; and the sword,
not of justice, but of war, decides the suit.
To be on the footing of 1763, it is not sufficient, that
the laws only be put in the same state, but, that our circumstances
likewise be put in the same state; our burnt and destroyed towns
repaired or built up, our private losses made good, our public debts
(contracted for defence) discharged; otherwise we shall be millions
worse than we were at that enviable period. Such a request, had it been
complied with a year ago, would have won the heart and soul of the
continent, but now it is too late. "The Rubicon is passed."
Besides, the taking up arms, merely to enforce the
repeal of a pecuniary law, seems as unwarrantable by the divine law,
and as repugnant to human feelings, as the taking up arms to enforce
obedience thereto. The object, on either side, doth not justify the
means; for the lives of men are too valuable to be cast away on such
trifles.
It is the violence which is done and threatened to our
persons; the destruction of our property by an armed force; the
invasion of our country by fire and sword, which conscientiously
qualifies the use of arms: and the instant in which such mode of
defence became necessary, all subjection to Britain ought to have
ceased; and the independence of America should have been considered as
dating its era from, and published by, the first musket that was fired
against her. This line is a line of consistency; neither drawn by
caprice, nor extended by ambition; but produced by a chain of events,
of which the colonies were not the authors.
I shall conclude these remarks, with the following
timely and well-intended hints. We ought to reflect, that there are
three different ways by which an independency may hereafter be
effected, and that one of those three, will, one day or other, be the
fate of America, viz. By the legal voice of the people in Congress; by
a military power, or by a mob: It may not always happen that our
soldiers are citizens, and the multitude a body of reasonable men;
virtue, as I have already remarked, is not hereditary, neither is it
perpetual.
Should an independency be brought about by the first of
those means, we have every opportunity and every encouragement before
us, to form the noblest, purest constitution on the face of the earth.
We have it in our power to begin the world over again. A situation,
similar to the present, hath not happened since the days of Noah until
now.
The birthday of a new world is at hand, and a race of
men, perhaps as numerous as all Europe contains, are to receive their
portion of freedom from the events of a few months. The reflection is
awful, and in this point of view, how trifling, how ridiculous, do the
little paltry cavilings of a few weak or interested men appear, when
weighed against the business of a world.
Should we neglect the present favorable and inviting
period, and independence be hereafter effected by any other means, we
must charge the consequence to ourselves, or to those rather whose
narrow and prejudiced souls are habitually opposing the measure,
without either inquiring or reflecting. There are reasons to be given
in support of independence which men should rather privately think of,
than be publicly told of.
We ought not now to be debating whether we shall be
independent or not, but anxious to accomplish it on a firm, secure, and
honorable basis, and uneasy rather that it is not yet began upon. Every
day convinces us of its necessity. Even the Tories (if such beings yet
remain among us) should, of all men, be the most solicitous to promote
it; for as the appointment of committees at first protected them from
popular rage, so, a wise and well established form of government will
be the only certain means of continuing it securely to them. Wherefore,
if they have not virtue enough to be WHIGS, they ought to have prudence
enough to wish for independence.
In short, independence is the only bond that tie and
keep us together. We shall then see our object, and our ears will be
legally shut against the schemes of an intriguing, as well as cruel,
enemy. We shall then, too, be on a proper footing to treat with
Britain; for there is reason to conclude, that the pride of that court
will be less hurt by treating with the American States for terms of
peace, than with those, whom she denominates "rebellious subjects," for
terms of accommodation.
It is our delaying in that, encourages her to hope for
conquest, and our backwardness tends only to prolong the war. As we
have, without any good effect therefrom, withheld our trade to obtain a
redress of our grievances, let us now try the alternative, by
independently redressing them ourselves, and thenoffering to open the
trade. The mercantile and reasonable part of England, will be still
with us; because, peace, with trade, is preferable to war without it.
And if this offer be not accepted, other courts may be applied to.
On these grounds I rest the matter. And as no offer hath
yet been made to refute the doctrine contained in the former editions
of this pamphlet, it is a negative proof, that either the doctrine
cannot be refuted, or, that the party in favor of it are too numerous
to be opposed. WHEREFORE, instead of gazing at each other with
suspicious or doubtful curiosity, let each of us hold out to his
neighbor the hearty hand of friendship, and unite in drawing a line,
which, like an act of oblivion, shall bury in forgetfulness every
former dissension. Let the names of Whig and Tory be extinct; and let
none other be heard among us, than those of a good citizen, an open and
resolute friend, and a virtuous supporter of the RIGHTS of MANKIND, and
of the FREE AND INDEPENDENT STATES OF AMERICA.
|