My Blogs
|
Common Sense Part 4
by Thomas Paine
Of the Present Ability
of America: with some Miscellaneous Reflections
October 1, 2005
(originally
published in 1776)
I HAVE never met with a man, either in England or America, who hath not
confessed his opinion, that a separation between the countries would
take place one time or other: And there is no instance in which we have
shown less judgment, than in endeavoring to describe, what we call, the
ripeness or fitness of the continent for independence.
As all men allow the measure, and vary only in their
opinion of the time, let us, in order to remove mistakes, take a
general survey of things, and endeavor if possible to find out the VERY
time. But I need not go far, the inquiry ceases at once, for the TIME
HATH FOUND US. The general concurrence, the glorious union of all
things, proves the fact.
'Tis not in numbers but in unity that our great strength
lies: yet our present numbers are sufficient to repel the force of all
the world. The Continent hath at this time the largest body of armed
and disciplined men of any power under Heaven: and is just arrived at
that pitch of strength, in which no single colony is able to support
itself, and the whole, when united, is able to do any thing. Our land
force is more than sufficient, and as to Naval affairs, we cannot be
insensible that Britain would never suffer an American man of war to be
built, while the Continent remained in her hands.
Wherefore, we should
be no forwarder an hundred years hence in that branch than we are now;
but the truth is, we should be less so, because the timber of the
Country is every day diminishing, and that which will remain at last,
will be far off or difficult to procure.
Were the Continent crowded with inhabitants, her
sufferings under the present circumstances would be intolerable. The
more seaport-towns we had, the more should we have both to defend and
to lose. Our present numbers are so happily proportioned to our wants,
that no man need be idle. The diminution of trade affords an army, and
the necessities of an army create a new trade.
Debts we have none: and whatever we may contract on this
account will serve as a glorious memento of our virtue. Can we but
leave posterity with a settled form of government, an independent
constitution of its own, the purchase at any price will be cheap. But
to expend millions for the sake of getting a few vile acts repealed,
and routing the present ministry only, is unworthy the charge, and is
using posterity with the utmost cruelty; because it is leaving them the
great work to do, and a debt upon their backs from which they derive no
advantage. Such a thought's unworthy a man of honour, and is the true
characteristic of a narrow heart and a piddling politician.
The debt we may contract doth not deserve our regard if
the work be but accomplished. No nation ought to be without a debt. A
national debt is a national bond; and when it bears no interest, is in
no case a grievance. Britain is oppressed with a debt of upwards of one
hundred and forty millions sterling, for which she pays upwards of four
millions interest. And as a compensation for her debt, she has a large
navy; America is without a debt, and without a navy; yet for the
twentieth part of the English national debt, could have a navy as large
again. The navy of England is not worth at this time more than three
millions and a half sterling.
The first and second editions of this pamphlet were
published without the following calculations, which are now given as a
proof that the above estimation of the navy is a just one. See Entic's
"Naval History," Intro., p. 56.
The charge of building a ship of each rate, and
furnishing her with masts, yards, sails, and rigging, together with a
proportion of eight months boatswain's and carpenter's sea-stores, as
calculated by Mr. Burchett, Secretary to the navy.
For a ship of 100 guns, ...... 35,553 £ 90 " .......... 29,886 80 " .......... 23,638 70 " .......... 17,785 60 " .......... 14,197 50 " .......... 10,606 40 " .......... 7,558 30 " .......... 5,846 20 " .......... 3,710
And hence it is easy to sum up the value, or cost, rather, of the whole
British navy, which, in the year 1757, when it was at its greatest
glory, consisted of the following ships and guns.
Ships Guns Cost of One Cost of All 6 ... 100 .... 35,553 £ .... 213,318 £ 12 ... 90 ..... 29,886 ...... 358,632 12 ... 80 ..... 23,638 ...... 283,656 43 ... 70 ..... 17,785 ...... 764,755 35 ... 60 ..... 14,197 ...... 496,895 40 ... 50 ..... 10,605 ...... 424,240 45 ... 40 ...... 7,558 ...... 340,110 58 ... 20 ...... 3,710 ...... 215,180
85 sloops, bombs, and fireships, one with another at 2,000 ... 170,000 Cost, ..... 3,266,786 £ Remains for guns, ....... 233,214 Total, ..... 3,500,000 £
No country on the globe is so happily situated, or so internally
capable of raising a fleet as America. Tar, timber, iron, and cordage
are her natural produce. We need go abroad for nothing. Whereas the
Dutch, who make large profits by hiring out their ships of war to the
Spaniards and Portuguese, are obliged to import most of the materials
they use. We ought to view the building a fleet as an article of
commerce, it being the natural manufactory of this country. 'Tis the
best money we can lay out. A navy when finished is worth more than it
cost: And is that nice point in national policy, in which commerce and
protection are united. Let us build; if we want them not, we can sell;
and by that means replace our paper currency with ready gold and
silver.
In point of manning a fleet, people in general run into
great errors; it is not necessary that one-fourth part should be
sailors. The Terrible privateer, captain Death, stood the hottest
engagement of any ship last war, yet had not twenty sailors on board,
though her complement of men was upwards of two hundred. A few able and
social sailors will soon instruct a sufficient number of active
landsmen in the common work of a ship.
Wherefore we never can be more
capable of beginning on maritime matters than now, while our timber is
standing, our fisheries blocked up, and our sailors and shipwrights out
of employ. Men of war, of seventy and eighty guns, were built forty
years ago in New England, and why not the same now? Ship building is
America's greatest pride, and in which she will, in time, excel the
whole world. The great empires of the east are mainly inland, and
consequently excluded from the possibility of rivalling her. Africa is
in a state of barbarism; and no power in Europe hath either such an
extent of coast, or such an internal supply of materials. Where nature
hath given the one, she hath withheld the other; to America only hath
she been liberal to both. The vast empire of Russia is almost shut out
from the sea; wherefore her boundless forests, her tar, iron and
cordage are only articles of commerce.
In point of safety, ought we to be without a fleet? We
are not the little people now which we were sixty years ago; at that
time we might have trusted our property in the streets, or fields
rather, and slept securely without locks or bolts to our doors and
windows. The case is now altered, and our methods of defence ought to
improve with our increase of property. A common pirate, twelve months
ago, might have come up the Delaware, and laid the city of Philadelphia
under contribution for what sum he pleased; and the same might have
happened to other places. Nay, any daring fellow, in a brig of fourteen
or sixteen guns, might have robbed the whole Continent, and carried off
half a million of money. These are circumstances which demand our
attention, and point out the necessity of naval protection.
Some perhaps will say, that after we have made it up
with Britain, she will protect us. Can they be so unwise as to mean
that she will keep a navy in our harbors for that purpose? Common sense
will tell us that the power which hath endeavoured to subdue us, is of
all others the most improper to defend us. Conquest may be effected
under the pretence of friendship; and ourselves, after a long and brave
resistance, be at last cheated into slavery. And if her ships are not
to be admitted into our harbours, I would ask, how is she going to
protect us? A navy three or four thousand miles off can be of little
use, and on sudden emergencies, none at all. Wherefore if we must
hereafter protect ourselves, why not do it for ourselves? Why do it for
another?
The English list of ships of war is long and formidable,
but not a tenth part of them are at any time fit for service, numbers
of them are not in being; yet their names are pompously continued in
the list; if only a plank be left of the ship; and not a fifth part of
such as are fit for service can be spared on any one station at one
time. The East and West Indies, Mediterranean, Africa, and other parts,
over which Britain extends her claim, make large demands upon her navy.
From a mixture of prejudice and inattention we have contracted a false
notion respecting the navy of England, and have talked as if we should
have the whole of it to encounter at once, and for that reason supposed
that we must have one as large; which not being instantly practicable,
has been made use of by a set of disguised Tories to discourage our
beginning thereon.
Nothing can be further from truth than this; for if
America had only a twentieth part of the naval force of Britain, she
would be by far an over-match for her; because, as we neither have, nor
claim any foreign dominion, our whole force would be employed on our
own coast, where we should, in the long run, have two to one the
advantage of those who had three or four thousand miles to sail over
before they could attack us, and the same distance to return in order
to refit and recruit. And although Britain, by her fleet, hath a check
over our trade to Europe, we have as large a one over her trade to the
West Indies, which, by laying in the neighborhood of the Continent,
lies entirely at its mercy.
Some method might be fallen on to keep up a naval force
in time of peace, if we should judge it necessary to support a constant
navy. If premiums were to be given to merchants to build and employ in
their service ships mounted with twenty, thirty, forty, or fifty guns
(the premiums to be in proportion to the loss of bulk to the merchant),
fifty or sixty of those ships, with a few guardships on constant duty,
would keep up a sufficient navy, and that without burdening ourselves
with the evil so loudly complained of in England, of suffering their
fleet in time of peace to lie rotting in the docks. To unite the sinews
of commerce and defence is sound policy; for when our strength and our
riches play into each other's hand, we need fear no external enemy.
In almost every article of defence we abound. Hemp
flourishes even to rankness so that we need not want cordage. Our iron
is superior to that of other countries. Our small arms equal to any in
the world. Cannon we can cast at pleasure. Saltpetre and gunpowder we
are every day producing. Our knowledge is hourly improving. Resolution
is our inherent character, and courage hath never yet forsaken us.
Wherefore, what is it that we want? Why is it that we hesitate? From
Britain we can expect nothing but ruin.
If she is once admitted to the
government of America again, this Continent will not be worth living
in. Jealousies will be always arising; insurrections will be constantly
happening; and who will go forth to quell them? Who will venture his
life to reduce his own countrymen to a foreign obedience? The
difference between Pennsylvania and Connecticut, respecting some
unlocated lands, shows the insignificance of a British government, and
fully proves that nothing but Continental authority can regulate
Continental matters.
Another reason why the present time is preferable to all
others is, that the fewer our numbers are, the more land there is yet
unoccupied, which, instead of being lavished by the king on his
worthless dependents, may be hereafter applied, not only to the
discharge of the present debt, but to the constant support of
government. No nation under Heaven hath such an advantage as this.
The infant state of the Colonies, as it is called, so
far from being against, is an argument in favour of independence. We
are sufficiently numerous, and were we more so we might be less united.
'Tis a matter worthy of observation that the more a country is peopled,
the smaller their armies are. In military numbers, the ancients far
exceeded the moderns; and the reason is evident, for trade being the
consequence of population, men became too much absorbed thereby to
attend to anything else.
Commerce diminishes the spirit both of
patriotism and military defence. And history sufficiently informs us
that the bravest achievements were always accomplished in the non-age
of a nation. With the increase of commerce England hath lost its
spirit. The city of London, notwithstanding its numbers, submits to
continued insults with the patience of a coward. The more men have to
lose, the less willing are they to venture. The rich are in general
slaves to fear, and submit to courtly power with the trembling
duplicity of a spaniel.
Youth is the seed-time of good habits as well in nations
as in individuals. It might be difficult, if not impossible, to form
the Continent into one government half a century hence. The vast
variety of interests, occasioned by an increase of trade and
population, would create confusion. Colony would be against colony.
Each being able would scorn each other's assistance; and while the
proud and foolish gloried in their little distinctions the wise would
lament that the union had not been formed before.
Wherefore the present
time is the true time for establishing it. The intimacy which is
contracted in infancy, and the friendship which is formed in
misfortune, are of all others the most lasting and unalterable. Our
present union is marked with both these characters; we are young, and
we have been distressed; but our concord hath withstood our troubles,
and fixes a memorable era for posterity to glory in.
The present time, likewise, is that peculiar time which
never happens to a nation but once, viz., the time of forming itself
into a government. Most nations have let slip the opportunity, and by
that means have been compelled to receive laws from their conquerors,
instead of making laws for themselves. First, they had a king, and then
a form of government; whereas the articles or charter of government
should be formed first, and men delegated to execute them afterwards;
but from the errors of other nations let us learn wisdom, and lay hold
of the present opportunity — TO BEGIN GOVERNMENT AT THE RIGHT
END.
When William the Conqueror subdued England, he gave them
law at the point of the sword; and, until we consent that the seat of
government in America be legally and authoritatively occupied, we shall
be in danger of having it filled by some fortunate ruffian, who may
treat us in the same manner, and then, where will be our freedom? where
our property?
As to religion, I hold it to be the indispensable duty
of government to protect all conscientious professors thereof, and I
know of no other business which government hath to do therewith. Let a
man throw aside that narrowness of soul, that selfishness of principle,
which the niggards of all professions are so unwilling to part with,
and he will be at once delivered of his fears on that head. Suspicion
is the companion of mean souls, and the bane of all good society. For
myself, I fully and conscientiously believe that it is the will of the
Almighty that there should be a diversity of religious opinions among
us. It affords a larger field for our Christian kindness; were we all
of one way of thinking, our religious dispositions would want matter
for probation; and on this liberal principle I look on the various
denominations among us to be like children of the same family,
differing only in what is called their Christian names.
In page [97] I threw out a few thoughts on the propriety
of a Continental Charter (for I only presume to offer hints, not plans)
and in this place I take the liberty of re-mentioning the subject, by
observing that a charter is to be understood as a bond of solemn
obligation, which the whole enters into, to support the right of every
separate part, whether of religion, professional freedom, or property.
A firm bargain and a right reckoning make long friends.
I have heretofore likewise mentioned the necessity of a
large and equal representation; and there is no political matter which
more deserves our attention. A small number of electors, or a small
number of representatives, are equally dangerous. But if the number of
the representatives be not only small, but unequal, the danger is
increased. As an instance of this, I mention the following: when the
petition of the associators was before the House of Assembly of
Pennsylvania, twenty-eight members only were present; all the Bucks
county members, being eight, voted against it, and had seven of the
Chester members done the same, this whole province had been governed by
two counties only; and this danger it is always exposed to.
The
unwarrantable stretch likewise, which that house made in their last
sitting, to gain an undue authority over the delegates of that
province, ought to warn the people at large how they trust power out of
their own hands. A set of instructions for their delegates were put
together, which in point of sense and business would have dishonoured a
school-boy, and after being approved by a few, a very few, without
doors, were carried into the house, and there passed IN BEHALF OF THE
WHOLE COLONY; whereas, did the whole colony know with what ill will
that house had entered on some necessary public measures, they would
not hesitate a moment to think them unworthy of such a trust.
Immediate necessity makes many things convenient, which
if continued would grow into oppressions. Expedience and right are
different things. When the calamities of America required a
consultation, there was no method so ready, or at that time so proper,
as to appoint persons from the several houses of assembly for that
purpose; and the wisdom with which they have proceeded hath preserved
this Continent from ruin. But as it is more than probable that we shall
never be without a CONGRESS, every well wisher to good order must own
that the mode for choosing members of that body deserves consideration.
And I put it as a question to those who make a study of mankind,
whether representation and election is not too great a power for one
and the same body of men to possess? When we are planning for
posterity, we ought to remember that virtue is not hereditary.
It is from our enemies that we often gain excellent
maxims, and are frequently surprised into reason by their mistakes. Mr.
Cornwall (one of the Lords of the Treasury) treated the petition of the
New York Assembly with contempt, because THAT house, he said, consisted
but of twenty-six members, which trifling number, he argued, could not
with decency be put for the whole. We thank him for his involuntary
honesty.
To CONCLUDE, however strange it may appear to some, or
however unwilling they may be to think so, matters not, but many strong
and striking reasons may be given to show that nothing can settle our
affairs so expeditiously as an open and determined declaration for
independence. Some of which are,
First.
— It is the custom of Nations, when any
two are at war, for some other powers, not engaged in the quarrel, to
step in as mediators, and bring about the preliminaries of a peace; But
while America calls herself the subject of Great Britain, no power,
however well disposed she may be, can offer her mediation. Wherefore,
in our present state we may quarrel on for ever.
Secondly.
— It is unreasonable to suppose that
France or Spain will give us any kind of assistance, if we mean only to
make use of that assistance for the purpose of repairing the breach,
and strengthening the connection between Britain and America; because,
those powers would be sufferers by the consequences.
Thirdly.
— While we profess ourselves the
subjects of Britain, we must, in the eyes of foreign nations, be
considered as Rebels. The precedent is somewhat dangerous to their
peace, for men to be in arms under the name of subjects; we, on the
spot, can solve the paradox; but to unite resistance and subjection
requires an idea much too refined for common understanding.
Fourthly.
— Were a manifesto to be published,
and despatched to foreign Courts, setting forth the miseries we have
endured, and the peaceful methods which we have ineffectually used for
redress; declaring at the same time that not being able longer to live
happily or safely under the cruel disposition of the British Court, we
had been driven to the necessity of breaking off all connections with
her; at the same time, assuring all such Courts of our peaceable
disposition towards them, and of our desire of entering into trade with
them; such a memorial would produce more good effects to this Continent
than if a ship were freighted with petitions to Britain.
Under our present denomination of British subjects, we
can neither be received nor heard abroad; the custom of all Courts is
against us, and will be so, until by an independence we take rank with
other nations.
These proceedings may at first seem strange and
difficult, but like all other steps which we have already passed over,
will in a little time become familiar and agreeable; and until an
independence is declared, the Continent will feel itself like a man who
continues putting off some unpleasant business from day to day, yet
knows it must be done, hates to set about it, wishes it over, and is
continually haunted with the thoughts of its necessity.
|